Macroscope alternative with direct rule-check pricing

Catch the fix an agent removes later.

A saved requirement makes a recurring mistake checkable. In this Perch capture from September 20, 2026, the same rule flags a missing guard and passes after the guard is restored.

def refund(order, payment):
    payment.refund(order.total)
    order.status = "refunded"
    return order

def refund(order, payment):
    if order.status == "refunded":
        return order
    payment.refund(order.total)
    order.status = "refunded"
    return order

Source: public order-service checkout.py at the linked commit. The captured standalone file is refund.py. Perch command output and timestamp. This saved-rule demonstration does not measure Macroscope's detection rate.

Perch vs Macroscope: what your team runs.

Perch turns project behavior into focused checks that agents can run before committing. Use these differences to choose the review workflow and billing model your team needs.

Macroscope alternative with direct rule-check pricing

Macroscope also offers an MIT CLI and no seat fees. Perch's distinction is the selected semantic requirement: save an ensure rule, apply it at project, file or method scope, and rerun that same check after the fix. Unchanged rule checks reuse cached answers for free.

Review before committing

Macroscope: MIT local CLI reviews working-tree and branch changes. Macroscope workflow documentation.

Perch reads the current working file with perch check. For a known requirement, select its rule name and method instead of requesting another broad review. A local CLI describes where the command runs; Perch sends relevant source to hosted TypeSafe models for analysis.

How do saved requirements differ?

Macroscope: Markdown agent instructions, path selection and configurable check-run agents. Macroscope rule documentation.

Perch stores English ensure rules in perch.yaml or .perch/rules/. Project, file and method scopes determine what is checked. Run the named check after an edit and after the repair; a rule finding can fail the command and a CI gate. Perch rules · Working-file checks.

What does the review bill depend on?

Compare Macroscope's billing unit and Perch's usage estimate

Is the CLI open source and offline?

Macroscope: MIT local CLI; commercial hosted analysis. Macroscope product or license source.

Perch’s CLI is MIT-licensed; hosted model inference is a separate paid service included in its published check rate. It does not run the model offline. Unchanged requests can reuse cached answers for free. Fresh judgments can vary, and a passing requirement check does not prove application correctness. Perch MIT license.

When does Macroscope fit the workflow?

Macroscope supports local agent review, worktree isolation and Check Run Agents. Its GitHub correctness reviews use diff-size pricing; its CLI reviews use model usage plus 5%. Those meters cannot be substituted for each other.

Estimate the review bill

Perch and Macroscope: pricing, allowances and workload calculator

Make the agent check its next edit.

npm install -g @lakeday/perch

perch rules add refund-once \
  --where refund.py --each method \
  --ensure "Refunded orders cannot be refunded again."

perch check refund.py::refund --rules refund-once

Use perch scan for repository code at Git HEAD and changed-code CI checks for pull requests. New model judgments can vary. Repeatability comes from cached answers for unchanged requests; a pass does not prove application correctness.