CodePulse Reviews offers GitHub review with a BYOK option; its Business tier adds custom rules, DeepReview and Semgrep. CodeRabbit provides local review and plan-dependent custom checks. Compare the tier that actually includes the required standard.
| Decision | CodeRabbit | CodePulse Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Review scope | Pull requests, local changes, and agent-loop review. | PR context, language-server tools and test/dependency execution. |
| Local review input | CLI and IDE review committed and uncommitted changes. | GitHub integration; local CLI was not verified. |
| Custom requirements | Guideline files and natural-language pre-merge checks; custom-check allowances depend on plan. | Business adds custom rules, DeepReview and Semgrep. |
| License and service | Commercial review service. | Commercial platform with BYOK option. |
| Official references | CodeRabbit sources | CodePulse Reviews sources |
Include provider costs for the BYOK plan and confirm whether the custom requirement needs Business. Review the same PR and verify how an uncommitted repair reaches the reviewer.
Essentials: $24/user/month billed annually, or $30 monthly. Public-repository reviews are free.
Essentials annual subscription floor; 1 repository and 5 included reviews/developer/hour. Eligible extra reviews cost 25¢ per reviewed file. Built-in checks are included; custom pre-merge checks start on Team.
BYOK: $6/active developer/month plus provider costs; Team: $29/developer/month; Business: $49.
BYOK subscription floor before model costs. Fair-use review rates apply; Team and Business include different features.
Subscription amounts are plan floors or quoted allowances. Repeated reviews, selected effort, provider charges and exclusions can change the bill. Equal review counts do not establish equal analysis scope.
A third option for the agent’s next edit
Perch is a stronger fit for adding a named requirement directly to the local agent workflow. Hosted analysis is included in its fresh-check rate, with no separate developer seats.
For an agent that repeatedly removes tenant authorization from a database update, save the requirement as a named Perch rule:
- name: tenant-scoped-update
where: "orders.py"
ensure: >-
The cancellation UPDATE must constrain tenant_id to actor.tenant_id
before changing the order. An id-only or owner-only update breaks
this requirement.This requirement comes from the FastAPI tenant-authorization recipe, which includes the implementation, deliberate regression and captured Perch checks. The same named check can run against the working file after the next agent edit. Perch working-file checks support selecting rules directly; rule selectors cover project, file and method scope.
npm install -g @lakeday/perch
perch login
perch setup claude-code
# Or choose: perch setup codex
# Or choose: perch setup cursorUse the setup command for your coding agent. Download the focused pack without replacing existing files:
curl -fL 'https://reporules.fyi/fastapi/tenant-cancellation/rule-pack.zip' -o tenant-rule.zip
unzip -n tenant-rule.zip
perch check orders.py --rules tenant-scoped-update --json
# Repair the reported finding after the agent edit.
perch check orders.py --rules tenant-scoped-update --jsonKeep your existing root perch.yaml. The ZIP adds its focused rule under .perch/rules/; unzip -n preserves existing files. Review and adapt the selector and application path before running it in your repository. Run the saved check after an edit, repair any finding, and repeat the identical check alongside application regression tests.
Download the tenant-authorization rule pack · Inspect pack contents and agent task
Perch charges 10¢ per 1,000 fresh rule checks, with no developer seat fees. Cached unchanged checks are free. About 50¢ per mid-sized PR is a rounded estimate for approximately 150 methods read at the captured September–October 2026 density of 34 questions per method; the unrounded example is 51¢. A single named-rule check is a different scope. Team workload calculations show the assumptions.
The Perch CLI is MIT licensed; hosted analysis is paid and relevant source is sent to the configured model service. Fresh model judgments can vary. Unchanged requests can reuse cached results.
This article compares documented product workflows and terms. The public evaluation materials include captured Perch requirement checks; authenticated CodeRabbit and Greptile runs remain unscored. They do not establish a measured accuracy ranking between these tools.
Reviewed October 14, 2026. Unverified features are marked as unverified rather than treated as absent. Current terms and actual trial results should determine a purchase.